Stay Up
to Date
Stay Up
to Date
Breaking News,
Updates, & More
Breaking News,
Updates, & More
Click Here to
Click Here to

Addressing the Needs of Previvors Struggling to Access Screening and Recommended Interventions

TON - September 2018, Vol 11, No 4 - Genetic Counseling
Cristi Radford, MS, CGC
Lisa Schlager
Vice President
Community Affairs
FORCE: Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered
Tampa, FL

In 2010, FORCE: Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered successfully spearheaded passage of a congressional resolution declaring the first-ever National Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer week. This also included National Previvor Day, an important step in giving an identity to individuals who have a strong family history and/or a gene mutation that places them at high risk for cancer but who do not have a cancer diagnosis. Previvors have unique needs and concerns that are separate from the general population as well as from individuals already diagnosed with cancer, and should be encouraged to connect with one another.

This year’s National Previvor Day is October 3, 2018. Over the past 8 years, the number of individuals identifying as previvors has continued to grow as more people have undergone germline genetic testing for inherited cancer risk. The most rapid escalation in testing can be traced back to 2013, when 3 important events occurred:

  • The US Supreme Court ruling struck down Myriad Genetics’ BRCA gene patents1
  • Angelina Jolie’s editorial about her BRCA1 mutation was published in The New York Times2
  • The US Preventive Services Task Force issued guidelines on “BRCA-Related Cancer: Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing.”3

The result was heightened awareness about BRCA mutations and hereditary cancers among the US population, increased competition in the genetic testing industry, and perhaps most importantly, insurance coverage of genetic counseling and BRCA testing for women who meet specific family cancer history and risk thresholds.

Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010, any preventive service receiving a grade of “A” or “B” from the US Preventive Services Task Force must be covered by most group health insurance plans with no out-of-pocket costs to the patient. This includes important screenings for cervical cancer (women aged 21-65 years), colorectal cancer (patients aged 50-75 years), and breast cancer (women aged 40-74 years),* as well as BRCA genetic counseling and testing for women who are suspected to be at increased risk for breast or ovarian cancer.3

Inclusion of these and other essential health benefits in the ACA enabled many Americans to access care that they may not otherwise have been able to afford. It is important to note, however, that with the exception of BRCA testing for women, the covered preventive services are for the “average risk” population. Previvors with an increased risk for cancer are no longer considered “average risk.” For example, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian recommend that women with BRCA gene mutations begin annual breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screenings with contrast at age 25 to 29 years, annual mammograms with consideration of tomosynthesis at age 30 years, and risk-reducing bilateral mastectomies are also an option.4 The NCCN guidelines for co­lorectal cancer recommend that colonoscopy should begin in the late teens for patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, and at age 20 to 25 years or 2 to 5 years before the earliest colon cancer in the family history for those with Lynch syndrome, and often be repeated every 1 to 2 years.5

So, what happens when a woman or man tests positive for BRCA or another mutation associated with familial cancers and needs to begin surveillance earlier than the general population, screening at increased intervals, or undergo risk-reducing procedures? Is this necessary medical care covered by insurance? The answer is not clear-cut. Health insurance companies are not required to cover any cancer screenings beyond those mandated in the ACA. As such, men who have not been diagnosed with cancer often struggle to get BRCA genetic testing covered. The 25-year-old woman with a BRCA gene mutation who needs an annual breast MRI may end up paying thousands of dollars out of pocket every year, whereas the woman with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, who should start mammograms at age 30 years, may have to meet her deductible or incur a significant copay, because she is not yet 40 years old, and therefore does not qualify for mammograms at no cost-sharing under the ACA.4 High-risk patients needing colonoscopies before age 50 years face the same issue.5 Previvors face similar challenges obtaining coverage for risk-reducing surgeries.

Women with BRCA1/2, BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D, and other genetic mutations are often advised to undergo a risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or hysterectomy because of the increased risk for ovarian cancer.4 Risk-reducing mastectomy may be considered for women with BRCA1/2, PTEN, or TP53 mutations as well as for women with mutations in other genes and an extensive family history of breast cancer.4 Although not required, the majority of group health insurance companies cover these surgeries for high-risk beneficiaries, but a substantial number of previvors must first file appeals to justify medical necessity. Ultimately, many high-risk patients end up saddled with medical debt caused by large deductibles, copays, and other extraneous expenses.

Clinical Implications

The clinical value of identifying individuals at high risk for cancer lies in an individual’s ability to access appropriate, evidence-based screening and preventive services that identify cancer at earlier stages or lower the risk for cancer. With dozens of genes associated with an increased risk for cancers, ranging from breast and colon, to endometrial, stomach, prostate, pancreatic, and ovarian, the need for personalized cancer screenings is growing substantially. These are our citizens at the highest risk for cancer.

Patients often assume that their needs will be met, but that is not necessarily the case. Learning that they are at an increased risk for cancer is only the beginning of the journey for many of these patients, especially unaffected carriers (ie, previvors). Faced with ongoing, high out-of-pocket costs each year, many individuals struggle to get the recommended screenings or skip them altogether. Increased screening or risk-reducing surgery are, however, only part of the clinical journey for some patients.

Another often overlooked issue facing high-risk patients is loss of fertility. The potential for treatment-induced infertility is well known and acknowledged in young adult patients diagnosed with cancer. Many patients are advised to consider fertility preservation via egg or embryo cryopreservation before beginning cancer-related treatment. But what about previvors? The NCCN recommends that BRCA1 mutation carriers undergo a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy between ages 35 and 40 years. High-risk women in their mid- to late-30s who have not yet started a family are faced with some tough choices—give up the dream of having a family or risk being diagnosed with an often fatal cancer. Unlike other patients who are diagnosed with cancer, previvors have little or no access to financial assistance for fertility preservation. The vast majority of grant programs are specifically for young cancer survivors. In addition, for patients who want to utilize preimplantation genetic diagnosis to ensure that their mutation is not passed on to their children, the options for financial aid are nearly nonexistent.

Although genetic testing can identify individuals at increased risk for cancer before the disease appears, it is important to recognize that this is only the beginning of what is often a long emotional and financial journey. Financial toxicity is well-recognized in the cancer survivor community and numerous programs exist in an effort to alleviate some of the burden. If the promise of personalized medicine is to be realized, we cannot overlook the parallel burdens faced by those at high risk for cancer. We need to explore ways to better ensure that these patients have affordable access to all of the services (eg, screening, preventive, and family building) they need.

*The US Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines, published in January 2016, raised the recommended age for commencement of screening mammography from 40 to 50 years. The Protecting Access to Lifesaving Screenings Act of 2015, however, placed a 2-year moratorium on the new guidelines. Under the ACA, this has maintained access to annual mammogram screenings with no insurance copay or cost-sharing for women aged 40 to 74 years.

For previvors in need of assistance, the following organizations may be able to help:

Cancer Screening Financial Assistance Programs
Federally Qualified Health Centers

Also called Community Health Centers, federally qualified health centers aim to provide care regardless of ability to pay. They are often the most knowledgeable about which providers and organizations in their local community offer services at discounts or sliding fee scales, and their main focus is providing prevention services such as screenings. All of the centers must provide access to mental health services and many provide access to general living assistance programs (eg, energy assistance, child care assistance, housing assistance). (

Hill-Burton Facilities
Most hospitals have social workers or financial assistance counselors who can direct patients to resources that provide assistance in paying for medical care. Some hospitals, designated as Hill-Burton facilities, receive money from the federal government. These hospitals must provide a certain amount of free or reduced-cost health services to those who cannot pay. (

National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program provides access to breast cancer screening services for underserved women aged ≥40 years in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, 6 US territories, and 13 Native American tribes. (

Patient Services Incorporated and Right Action for Women
Patient Services Incorporated is a national nonprofit organization that administers an MRI financial assistance program for high-risk women funded by Right Action for Women. ( and

Patient Advocate Foundation
The Patient Advocate Foundation is a national nonprofit organization that serves as an active liaison between the patient and their insurer, employer, and/or creditors to resolve insurance, job discrimination, and/or debt crisis matters relative to their diagnosis through case managers, doctors, and attorneys. (

Screening within Research Studies
FORCE: Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered

FORCE has a searchable database of research studies for high-risk individuals and gene mutation carriers that may cover the cost of screening or preventive interventions within the study. (

Insurance Appeals
Cancer Legal Resource Center

The Cancer Legal Resource Center champions the rights of individuals affected by cancer, providing information through its national telephone assistance line, outreach programs, and community activities. It also offers a step-by-step guide to filing an insurance appeal. (

National Cancer Legal Services Network
The National Cancer Legal Services Network promotes increased availability of free legal services programs so that individuals affected by cancer may focus on medical care and their quality of life. (

FORCE: Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered
FORCE has developed sample insurance appeal letters for a variety of screening and preventive services recommended for high-risk men and women. (


  1. De Vogue A. Supreme Court strikes down BRCA gene patent. June 13, 2013. Accessed August 8, 2018.
  2. Jolie A. My medical choice. May 14, 2013. Accessed August 8, 2018.
  3. US Preventive Services Task Force. BRCA-related cancer: risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing. Updated March 2017. Accessed August 8, 2018.
  4. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines): Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian. Version 1.2018. July 11, 2018. Accessed August 8, 2018.
  5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines): Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal. Version 1.2018. July 12, 2018. Accessed August 8, 2018.
Related Items
Formal Hereditary Cancer Genetic Counseling Improves Patient Outcomes
Meg Barbor, MPH
TON - December 2019, Vol 12, No 6 published on December 5, 2019 in Genetic Counseling
DNA Repair Targeted Therapy: Expanding Options for Patients with Cancer
TON - April 2019, Vol 12, No 2 published on April 22, 2019 in Genetic Counseling
Variants of Uncertain Significance—Frequently Asked Questions
Cristi Radford, MS, CGC, Michele Gabree, MS, CGC
TON - July 2018, Vol 11, No 3 published on July 25, 2018 in Genetic Counseling
New Criteria for Inherited Prostate Cancer Genetic Testing
Cristi Radford, MS, CGC
TON - March 2018, Vol 11, No 1 published on March 9, 2018 in Genetic Counseling, NCCN
Is It Time to Reevaluate Universal Screening Strategies for Lynch Syndrome in Patients Newly Diagnosed with Colorectal Cancer?
Cristi Radford, MS, CGC, Nicole Centers, BSN, RN, OCN, CBCN, CN-BN
TON - September 2017, Vol 10, No 5 published on September 10, 2017 in Genetic Counseling
Survivorship Clinics—A Second Opportunity for Genetic Risk Stratification
Cristi Radford, MS, CGC, Nicole Centers, BSN, RN, OCN, CBCN, CN-BN
TON - July 2017, Vol 10, No 4 published on July 6, 2017 in Genetic Counseling
Therapeutic Implications—The Next Era of Genetic Diagnosis
Cristi Radford, MS, CGC
TON - May 2017, Vol 10, No 3 published on May 17, 2017 in Genetic Counseling
New Data Suggest the Benefit of Multigene Panel Testing for Patients with Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer
Cristi Radford, MS, CGC
TON - March 2017, Vol 10, No 2 published on March 7, 2017 in Genetic Counseling
Is It Time to Reconsider Testing Adolescents for Familial BRCA Mutations?
Courtney Lewis, MS, CGC , Cristi Radford, MS, CGC
TON - January 2017, Vol 10, No 1 published on January 12, 2017 in Genetic Counseling
Risk and Management Updates for Inherited Colorectal Cancer
Courtney Lewis, MS, CGC , Cristi Radford, MS, CGC
TON - November 2016, Vol 9, No 6 published on November 15, 2016 in Genetic Counseling
Last modified: April 27, 2020